|
Post by Vicki Pettersson on Apr 21, 2008 21:06:46 GMT -5
Well the very first manual must contain the creations of both sides of shadow and light wouldn't it? Maybe I'm thinking way too much. Mouse is right. That's exactly what it shows. The prophesy of the Tulpa, and later the Kairos was all a part of it.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Apr 21, 2008 21:11:15 GMT -5
Woo Hoo! I was right! So if The Tupla had the first manual then he wouldn't be worried about anything. He would have the plans to destroy the lights!
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Apr 21, 2008 21:32:10 GMT -5
Well the very first manual must contain the creations of both sides of shadow and light wouldn't it? Maybe I'm thinking way too much. Mouse is right. That's exactly what it shows. The prophesy of the Tulpa, and later the Kairos was all a part of it. So it shows the prophecy of the Tulpa in the first manual, not his creation? The creation of the Tulpa is not the same thing as the birth of the Shadows, correct? But Mouse makes total sense in saying that if he had the manual about his creation, basically the instructions on how to kill him, he'd be chillin'. Personally I like Regan...Then again I'm a guy and she's 'saucy!' Eww! She's FOUL!
|
|
|
Post by Vicki Pettersson on Apr 21, 2008 22:02:33 GMT -5
Raven,
Yes! Everything you said.
Esp. about Regan being foul. DL -- what are you thinking?!
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Apr 21, 2008 22:13:58 GMT -5
This message might contain some spoiler please do not read further if you don't wish to know future information.
Is it wrong to think of Rogain when I think of Regan? Honestly I think Regan is such a wannabe.. She's so desperate for attention that she has to copy cat's Jo's old life instead of creating her own.
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Apr 22, 2008 8:52:47 GMT -5
Well Mouse, it's the nature of being Shadow. She doesn't necessary give a shit about Ben's attention. She just wants to get under Jo's skin. Jo is her adversary- an Agent of Light. So she's getting to Jo by getting Ben. And what better way to get Ben than by becoming Jo?
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Apr 22, 2008 11:43:33 GMT -5
I know.. I still think of rogain when I think of her. Maybe Jo should try to impersonate her. You know? Find out her personal life and try to merge with it. Mess with Rogan's head.
|
|
|
Post by vampyre on Apr 22, 2008 12:15:19 GMT -5
Wouldn't Jolivia's dual nature let her use the manuals to find out more about "Rogain"? This would let her do just what mouse said. Or am I not understanding how they work?
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Apr 22, 2008 12:30:13 GMT -5
The manuals only show their superhero activities and not their personal activities? So Jolivia would have to do some research.
|
|
|
Post by vampyre on Apr 22, 2008 12:35:15 GMT -5
I thought I had that part messed up.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Apr 22, 2008 12:40:57 GMT -5
But can you imagine if the manuals showed all your personal activities? Going to the bathroom wouldn't be safe!
|
|
|
Post by vampyre on Apr 22, 2008 13:43:48 GMT -5
Has it ever been?
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Apr 22, 2008 13:45:07 GMT -5
Safe to go to the bathroom? hopefully my bathroom is safe.
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Apr 22, 2008 14:07:00 GMT -5
Regan. Say it like Ronald Reagan. Not Rogain. Or like the little girl in The Exorcist. ;D Wouldn't Jolivia's dual nature let her use the manuals to find out more about "Rogain"? This would let her do just what mouse said. Or am I not understanding how they work? I think you're exactly right, Vamp.
|
|
|
Post by vampyre on Apr 22, 2008 14:11:21 GMT -5
I know how to say her name I was just making a joke of her name.
I'm not sure how much detail the manuals give out. I know it'd be bad if they reveal secret IDs.
|
|